Affinity vs The Swarm
A private capital CRM priced per seat, against a relationship data layer priced per company. They land on the same shortlist because both promise the firm's network.
By Jerry Feng, Growth at Happenstance. Updated August 28, 2026.
The short version
Affinity, if you need a system of record; The Swarm, if you need a data layer, which is why the price gap between them isn't a discount. Affinity is an AI-first CRM for private capital firms at $2,000 to $2,700 per user per year, capturing the firm's email and calendar and running the deal pipeline. The Swarm sells relationship data and an API: free up to 10 connectors, then Premium at $99 per company per month, over a 500 million profile dataset with daily job-change tracking. They get compared because both promise the firm's network.
Affinity details and prices from affinity.co public pages, including its pricing and relationship intelligence pages. The Swarm details and prices from theswarm.com, its help center and its developer documentation.
What each one is
Affinity sells itself as the AI-first private capital CRM, with the homepage line your next deal is in your network. The Swarm calls itself the relationship data company and, on its homepage, the relationship intelligence leader. Both sentences describe a firm getting more out of who it knows. Only one of the two products is somewhere your team logs in every day.
Affinity
- Site
- affinity.co
- Category
- CRM for private capital firms
- Customers
- 3,300 or more private capital firms, its own claim
- Free plan
- None
- Self-serve trial
- None. Every tier is contact sales
- Prices
- Essential $2,000, Scale $2,300, Advanced $2,700, per user per year; Enterprise custom
- Priced by
- Seat, billed annually
- Security
- Fund-level permissions, SSO and custom data retention on Enterprise
The Swarm
- Site
- theswarm.com
- Category
- Relationship data and API
- Funding
- $8M in total, its own posts; $4M seed led by 500 Global, HubSpot Ventures backing
- Customers
- Not published
- Free plan
- Yes, up to 10 connectors, no API access
- Self-serve trial
- The free plan is one
- Prices
- Premium $99 per company per month, $2,990 per company per year; Enterprise custom
- Priced by
- Company and connectors, not seats
- Security
- Not published
Two events this summer. The Swarm announced its acquisition of Commsor on July 23, 2026, with Commsor's products being wound down and features folded in. Affinity launched its agent platform, Affinity Ascend, on July 21, 2026, and it appears on the live pricing page from the Scale tier. Both products changed their pricing this summer, and by enough to matter.
Side by side
Several rows go to The Swarm and several to Affinity, which is what two products in different categories look like side by side.
| Affinity | The Swarm | |
|---|---|---|
| Price and packaging | ||
| Free plan | No | Up to 10 connectors, no API |
| Self-serve purchase | No | Free plan, yes; Premium, self-serve |
| Published prices | Essential $2,000, Scale $2,300, Advanced $2,700 per user per year | Premium $99 per company per month; $2,990 per company per year |
| Priced by | Per seat, annually | Per company, by connector count |
| Cost for a ten-person firm | $20,000 a year at the entry tier | $1,188 a year at the monthly Premium rate |
| Enterprise tier | Custom | Custom |
| Where the network comes from | ||
| First-party capture | Automatic email and calendar capture across the whole firm | Connectors: team members with logins, plus connections added manually |
| Coverage limit | Every licensed seat | 10 connectors free, 50 on Premium, custom on Enterprise |
| External dataset | Enrichment from 40 or more sources; PitchBook, Dealroom and Crunchbase on Advanced | 500 million profiles, 50 million companies with fundraising data |
| Daily job-change tracking | Not published | Yes |
| Relationship strength scoring | Core feature, based on recency and frequency | Path ranking through the Network Mapper |
| Personal social accounts | Not published | Connectors import from LinkedIn and Google Contacts |
| What you do in it | ||
| Deal pipeline and lists | Yes | No |
| Notetaker | Scale and up | Not published |
| AI chat inside the product | Scale and up | Filter-driven search; plain language via MCP |
| Agents | Affinity Ascend, Scale and up | Not published |
| Workflow automations | Advanced | Not published |
| CSV export | Not published | Up to 10,000 people on Premium |
| Data and developers | ||
| Public API | Enterprise; unlimited API on that tier | Paid tiers; 12,000 credits a month on Premium |
| Credit overage | Not published | $0.10 per credit |
| MCP server | Scale and up; reaches Affinity data from Claude, ChatGPT and Snowflake | Claude, ChatGPT and any client with custom headers; OAuth scoped to the user |
| Integrations | Slack, Salesforce and Box packaged on Advanced | HubSpot, Attio, Clay, Airtable, browser extension |
| SSO | Enterprise | Not published |
| Individual plan | No | Free plan exists, but the model assumes a team |
Affinity is a CRM, The Swarm is a data source
Affinity is a CRM in the full sense: lists, views, a deal pipeline, an activity history that fills itself from the firm's email and calendar, and on the upper tiers a notetaker, AI chat and the Ascend agent platform. Buying it's a decision to make one product the firm's system of record, which is an adoption project as much as a purchase. Affinity sells dedicated implementation and success support at the Enterprise tier, which tells you how the company expects a rollout to go.
The Swarm isn't a place to work. It's a dataset, a network mapper and an API, and its own positioning is by builders, for builders. The in-app experience is filter-driven and data-centric; conversational questions are handled mainly through the MCP server, and the deep integrations are with HubSpot, Attio and Clay, which is to say with the systems where the work happens. Its pricing axis is connectors and credits, not seats, because you're buying access to data rather than a workspace.
That's why the comparison keeps happening and keeps disappointing people. A firm evaluating Affinity is choosing a system of record. A firm evaluating The Swarm is choosing a source of relationship data to feed something it already has. If you have not decided which of those two problems you're solving, no feature table will separate them for you.
Per seat against per company: what each costs a team
Affinity is priced per user per year: $2,000 for Essential, $2,300 for Scale, $2,700 for Advanced, billed annually, sales-led at every tier. A five-person fund on Essential is $10,000 a year. Ten people on Advanced is $27,000. The number scales exactly with how many people you want inside the system, which is a reasonable model for a product whose value is the shared record.
The Swarm is priced per company. Premium is $99 per company per month, and the axis that changes is connectors: 10 on the free plan, 50 on Premium, custom above that. Ten people at $99 a month is $1,188 a year in total, not per person. Annual billing is $2,990 per company per year.
The order of magnitude is real, and it is not a bargain so much as a different purchase. What Affinity charges per seat buys pipeline, permissions, capture and support. What The Swarm charges per company buys data and API access, with the free tier deliberately withholding the API so that the thing you'd build on starts at the paid rung.
Where each graph comes from
Affinity captures what the firm did. Every licensed person's email and calendar flows in automatically, relationship strength is scored on recency and frequency of real interactions, and the result is a picture of who the firm has spoken to, enriched from 40 or more external sources including PitchBook, Preqin and Grata. Its published scale claims are 25 billion or more emails and calendar events captured and 130 billion or more structured relationships. The weakness is that it is bounded by the firm's systems, and it advertises no connection to a partner's personal LinkedIn or Twitter graph.
The Swarm builds outward from connectors. Active connectors are team members with logins, passive connectors are people whose professional histories you add, and each one extends the map. On top of that sits an external dataset of 500 million profiles with daily job-change tracking and 50 million companies with fundraising data, and a Network Mapper that explores extended networks using work-history correlations, common investors and its own signals. The weakness is that path quality is bounded by connector count, which is exactly what the plan tiers meter.
One is deep on what your firm knows first-hand. The other is broad on what's publicly true about a very large number of people. A firm with a long history and heavy email volume gets more from the first. A firm sourcing into markets it hasn't yet touched gets more from the second.
Choose Affinity if
- The firm needs one system of record, with deals, stages, lists and reporting in it
- Automatic capture of every partner's email and calendar is the point, not a bonus
- Fund-level permissions, SSO and data retention policies will come up in diligence
- Enrichment from PitchBook, Dealroom and Crunchbase belongs inside the CRM
- A per-seat annual commitment of $2,000 and up is within the operating budget
Choose The Swarm if
- You already have a CRM and want relationship data flowing into it
- A 500 million profile dataset with daily job-change tracking is what you are missing
- Someone on the team will build against an API, or work through Claude and ChatGPT over MCP
- Per-company pricing suits you better than per seat, especially with a larger team
- You want to test the network mapping for nothing before committing
If your question is smaller than either product
Both of these are firm-level purchases whose value comes from a shared asset the firm administers: Affinity's captured record, The Swarm's connector map and dataset. Both assume there's someone whose job includes keeping it healthy. That's the right shape for a fund, an investment bank or a partnerships team. It's a heavy shape for one person, or three, who mostly want to know who they and their friends already know.
Happenstance is scoped to that smaller question. Each person connects their own accounts, Gmail, Outlook, Google Calendar, Google Contacts, LinkedIn, Twitter and Instagram, groups pool those networks into one graph any member can search, and questions are asked in plain English. There's a public API and an MCP server, and the free plan is the whole product with usage limits on chat and on web searches beyond your network. A firm that needs a system of record buys Affinity; a team that needs a licensed dataset buys The Swarm; Happenstance is the search layer beside either.
Running both, which is what most firms do
A good number of firms end up with Affinity as the record and The Swarm as a source feeding it, which is the configuration both products are shaped for. The Swarm's integrations point at HubSpot, Attio, Clay and Airtable rather than at Affinity specifically, so check the route before assuming it, and note that Affinity's own API sits on the Enterprise tier while The Swarm's starts at Premium.
If you are switching rather than stacking, the direction matters. A firm moving from The Swarm to Affinity is adopting a CRM and should plan the implementation accordingly. A firm moving from Affinity to The Swarm is giving up the pipeline and needs somewhere else for it to live first. The cheap first step in either direction is The Swarm's free plan, since 10 connectors is enough to see what its mapping returns for your firm before anyone signs anything.
What Happenstance can see
Email is read as headers only. Message content and attachments never reach our servers. Yes. Your connections are searchable only by you, the friends you accept, and the groups you join, and sharing is always mutual. Your public profile shows a constellation of named people you know by default, which you can turn off anytime. We never share, sell, or use your data to train AI models. Happenstance is SOC 2 certified and DTI Trust Level 2; the full list of what is stored and for how long is on the security page.
Frequently asked questions
Is The Swarm cheaper than Affinity?
By a very large margin, and they're priced on different units. Affinity is $2,000 to $2,700 per user per year, so a ten-person firm starts at $20,000 a year. The Swarm's Premium plan is $99 per company per month, not per seat, and there's a free plan up to 10 connectors. The gap reflects a difference in what you get: a CRM your firm runs on, against a dataset and an API you call from something else.
Does Affinity have a free plan?
No, and no self-serve trial either. Affinity publishes its prices, but every tier goes through sales. The cheapest published entry point is $2,000 per seat per year, billed annually.
Does The Swarm have a free plan?
Yes. The free plan covers up to 10 connectors, combined network access, enriched profiles and community support, and it has no API access. API access, the full database, CSV exports and the 12,000 monthly credits start on Premium at $99 per company per month. Annual billing is $2,990 per company per year.
What's the difference between Affinity and The Swarm?
Affinity is where the deal lives. It captures your firm's email and calendar automatically, scores relationship strength and holds the pipeline. AI chat, a notetaker and agents arrive on the higher tiers. The Swarm is where relationship data comes from. It maps warm paths through connectors, sells access to a 500 million profile dataset with daily job-change tracking, and expects you to consume it through its API, its MCP server or an integration with HubSpot, Attio or Clay.
Which is better for venture capital?
Affinity, if the firm wants one system of record. It's built specifically for private capital and claims 3,300 or more firms as customers. Deal pipeline, fund-level permissions and enrichment from sources including PitchBook, Dealroom and Crunchbase come with the Advanced tier. The Swarm is a strong complement for sourcing and job-change data, and a poor substitute for the CRM, because it does not run your pipeline.
Do Affinity and The Swarm have an MCP server?
Both do. Affinity's MCP server is available from the Scale tier and lets a firm reach its Affinity data from Claude, ChatGPT and Snowflake. The Swarm's MCP works with Claude, ChatGPT and any client that supports custom headers, uses OAuth to scope results to the user's own access, and makes most of its tools free with three data-retrieval tools charged at one credit per successful search.
Can The Swarm replace Affinity?
Only if you weren't really using Affinity as a CRM. The Swarm has no deal pipeline, no fund-level permissioning and no notetaker. Its in-app search is filter-driven rather than conversational, with plain-language questions handled mainly through the MCP. Firms do run both: The Swarm for external data and warm paths, Affinity as the record. Replacing one with the other means giving up either the pipeline or the dataset.
Is there a free alternative to Affinity and The Swarm?
The Swarm's own free plan up to 10 connectors is the first thing to try, since it costs nothing. For the narrower job of searching the network you and your colleagues already have, Happenstance is free: seven connected accounts per person, groups that pool networks, and plain-English questions. Pro raises the limits. The deal pipeline is Affinity's and the licensed dataset is The Swarm's; Happenstance runs beside either.
Make your own luck
Join 500,000+ professionals already searching their whole network.